Re: WITH clause
От | Alvaro Herrera Munoz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WITH clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031212190754.GA11548@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WITH clause (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: WITH clause
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 10:13:56AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > I'm looking to the SQL WITH clause as a way to get better regex > support in PostgreSQL. I've been chatting a little bit about this, > and here's an idea for a behavior. Implementation details TBD. I think you could be rather looking at keeping the regmatch_t * from RE_compile_and_execute somewhere in the TopTransactionContext, and create accessor functions to it. You could do BEGIN; SELECT ... x ~ '([0-9]+)x([0-9]+)'; SELECT regex_parens(1), regex_parens(2); COMMIT; Etc, you get the idea. Of course you could only access the captured expressions from the last regex, and only within the same transaction block. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>) Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost. (Lincoln Yeoh)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: