Re: Multi column foreign keys.
От | Mofeed Shahin |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi column foreign keys. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200312110901.00049.mofeed.shahin@dsto.defence.gov.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multi column foreign keys. (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi column foreign keys.
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 01:31 pm, you wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Mofeed Shahin wrote: > > Some questions though: > > When I do > > DatabaseMetaData metaData = connection.getMetaData (); > > ResultSet tableResultSet = metaData.getTables ("", null, null, new > > String[]{"TABLE"}) > > > > I'm actually getting alot more tables than I wanted. I seem to be getting > > all the system tables, which I don't want. > > With 7.4 came the information_schema which I believe is what you are > seeing. The attached patch should fix that. Once again, thanks alot. That worked very well. Will these patches be applied to the standard jdbc driver ? > > I also get messages like : > > "Column is_insertable_into in table views has unknown type code 1111" > > This message is probably from your own code after doing > DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() on information_schema.views. The DATA_TYPE > column is returning java.sql.Types.OTHER which you don't know how to > handle. Perhaps we need to look at how domains are handled here and it > should return the base type's code, but as this problem is in the > information schema you shouldn't have to deal with in. Right you are. Thanks. Mof.
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: