Re: Solaris Performance (Again)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff
Тема Re: Solaris Performance (Again)
Дата
Msg-id 20031210085323.749a549f.threshar@torgo.978.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Solaris Performance (Again)  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
Ответы Re: Solaris Performance (Again)  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:56:38 +1300
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

> The major performance killer appeared to be mounting the filesystem
> with the logging option. The next most significant seemed to be the
> choice of sync_method for Pg - the default (open_datasync), which we
> initially thought should be the best - appears noticeably slower than
> fdatasync.
>

Some interesting stuff, I'll have to play with it. Currently I'm pleased
with my solaris performance.

What version of PG?

If it is before 7.4 PG compiles with _NO_ optimization by default and
was a huge part of the slowness of PG on solaris.


--
Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Kirkwood
Дата:
Сообщение: Solaris Performance (Again)
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TRUNCATE veeeery slow compared to DELETE in 7.4