Re: request for feedback - read-only GUC variables, pg_settings

Joe Conway wrote:
> We (mostly Bruce, Tom, Peter, and I) have been having a discussion on 
> the PATCHES list regarding some new functionality related to read-only 
> GUC variables. The net result is pasted at the bottom of this post. Here 
> is a link to the discussion:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-11/msg00363.php
> 
> In short, 5 new read-only GUC variables are created allowing the value 
> of certain compile-time settings to be queried. Also the pg_settings 
> system view has been expanded to include category, short_desc, and 
> extra_desc (corresponding to group, short_desc, and long_desc in the 
> generic guc structure). The 5 GUC variables are:
> 
> block_size - int
>    Shows size of a disk block


> The main open question at this point is the name for the "block_size" 
> variable. Peter favors "block_size", Bruce favors "page_size", Tom 
> hasn't taken a position on that specific issue. Does anyone have and 
> opinion on the variable name, or any general comments before I commit this?

I hate to reply to this because I have already cast my vote, but
"block_size" does not report the size of a disk block.  It reports the
size of a PostgreSQL block/page.  Disk blocks are almost always 512
bytes in size.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073