Re: cross table indexes or something?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cross table indexes or something? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200312021127.52839.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cross table indexes or something? (Jeremiah Jahn <jeremiah@cs.earlham.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: cross table indexes or something?
Re: cross table indexes or something? |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeremiah, > Thanks to all, I had already run analyze. But the STATISTICS setting > seems to have worked. I'm just not sure what it did..? Would anyone care > to explain. The STATISTICS setting improves the granularity of statistics kept by the query planner on that column; increasing the granularity (i.e. more random samples) can significantly improve things in cases where you have data whose distribution is significantly skewed. Certainly whenever you see the query planner using a slow nestloop becuase of a bad row-return estimate, it is one of the first things to try. Its drawbacks are 4-fold: 1) to keep it working, you will probably need to run ANALZYE more often than you have been; 2) these ANALYZEs will take longer, and have the annoying side effect of flooring your CPU while they do; 3) You will have to be sure that your vacuum plan includes vacuuming the pg_statistic table as the database superuser, as that table will be getting updated more often. 4) Currently, pg_dump does *not* back up statistics settings. So you will need to save a script which does this in preparation for having to restore your database. Which is why the stats are set low by default. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: