Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200312012148.hB1LmWr09637@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: export FUNC_MAX_ARGS as a read-only GUC variable
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Joe Conway wrote: > >>The description is a statement because the option is boolean, i.e. the > >>statement "Datetimes are integer based" is either "true" or "false" > >>("on" or "off", etc). How stongly do you feel about it? I don't think > >>"integer_datetime_storage" is accurate in any case. > > > > Not strongly. Keep it unchanged. > > > > Any more thoughts on block_size (or page_size)? When I think of block size I think of disk blocks, and when I think of pages I think of memory pages. Unfortunately, neither is a database page. I guess my point is that we have heap pages and index pages, but no one calls them heap blocks or index blocks, and I am not sure I would know what they meant if they said that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: