Re: cleanup execTuples.c
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cleanup execTuples.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311300441.hAU4fQH27678@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: cleanup execTuples.c (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > Please use names for the replacement routines that are more clear > > than "fooInternal". You can get away with that kind of name for a > > static function, but I think globally visible ones should have more > > meaningful names. > > The only function I named "fooInternal" was ExecTypeFromTLInternal, > which is static. > > > For ExecTypeFromTLInternal, maybe use ExecTupDescFromTL, which is a > > more accurate name in the first place > > What's the logic in having ExecTypeFromTL() and ExecCleanTypeFromTL() > implemented in terms of a function called ExecTupDescFromTL()? i.e. if > we're going to be renaming functions, wouldn't it make sense to rename > the public API functions, not the internal static functions? > > > As for the Slot functions, I agree with getting rid of the macros, > > which seem to add little except obfuscation. But I see no need to > > introduce an extra layer of calls. Why not make them all go > > directly to ExecAllocTableSlot(estate->es_tupleTable)? > > Yeah, I was considering that, both ways seemed about equal to me. > > Attached is a revised version of the patch. I've adopted Tom's > suggestion for the slot functions. For renaming > ExecTypeFromTLInternal(), I haven't changed the name of the function > (see my comments above), but if you clarify what you're suggesting, I > can submit another version of the patch. > > BTW, this code includes the comment: > > * Currently there are about 4 different places where we create > * TupleDescriptors. They should all be merged, or perhaps be > * rewritten to call BuildDesc(). > > Aside from the fact that BuildDesc() doesn't exist anymore AFAICS, > would this still be a reasonable reorganization to make? > > -Neil [ Attachment, skipping... ] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: