Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311291812.hATICwu09572@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: -fpic vs. -fPIC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu> writes: > > The project lead for the Aurora SPARC Linux project is who recommended it in > > the first place; > > We were told equally positively, by equally well-informed persons, that > we should prefer -fpic if at all possible. > > The best I have been able to tell is that none of our .so's are anywhere > near large enough to require -fPIC. In the absence of any evidence that > we really are near the threshold, I'd prefer to go for the > better-performing alternative. One question would be what happens when it fails? Does it fail visibly so we would hear about it? If so, we can take the risk. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: