Re: Postgresql on file system EXT2 or EXT3
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql on file system EXT2 or EXT3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031129140657.GA669@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql on file system EXT2 or EXT3 (Mike Benoit <mikeb@netnation.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 02:46:50PM -0800, Mike Benoit wrote: > I would be very interested in seeing actual PGBENCH results with > databases on the different file systems, thats the only way you will > know for sure which file system is best for the task. I suspect because of the nature of its workload, in my experience pg_bench is lousy for measuring filesystem performance: it always bottlenecks somewhere else. Chris Browne did some work for us some time ago evaluating XFS, JFS, and ext3, and concluded that JFS was the best under a high-update load; that workload was selected precisely because it was I/O bound. I thought he sent the results to the -performance list, but I can't put my hands on the email right now. Chris? A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: