Re: S.M.A.R.T. hard drives WAS: SCSI vs. IDE performance test
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: S.M.A.R.T. hard drives WAS: SCSI vs. IDE performance test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311282145.hASLjqc14536@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | S.M.A.R.T. hard drives WAS: SCSI vs. IDE performance test (Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: S.M.A.R.T. hard drives WAS: SCSI vs. IDE performance
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > Actually, drives have S.M.A.R.T for reporting these kind of issues. The idea > > being that a counter decrements every time a block is remapped. When it > > reaches a declared threshold the drive declares an error and if it's in > > warranty that's enough to convince the manufacturer to send you a new disk. > > > > Not that many people use this feature, but it is there. > > I used smartsuite (http://sourceforge.net/projects/smartsuite/) to view > the status of the drives, but the relocated sector count appears only > available on ide drives. Does anyone know if that is the nature of scsi > drives or is it just a limitation of that tool? Do SCSI drives even do relocation? I had a Seagate SCSI drive that would beep every time I tried to access a bad block, basically telling me to replace the drive. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: