Re: fork/exec
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: fork/exec |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200311282142.hASLgAL13880@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: fork/exec (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Oh, good. I couldn't remember if it was the postmaster or child that > > validates that key. I now remember only the postmaster needs the secret > > because it sends the signal. > > However, the child process needs the secret for long enough to send it > off to the client at the completion of the authentication handshake. > So there is a problem to resolve here. Oh, yea, so they do both need it. Good point. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: