Re: fork/exec
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fork/exec |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311282124.hASLOMc11067@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fork/exec (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: fork/exec
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > The random seed value is unique per-backend, and we want to keep it > > secure so we can't pass it on the command line. I am not sure how to > > deal with that. > > Uh, you mean the cancel key? There's no need for the random() seed per > se to be shared between postmaster and backend, AFAICS. Oh, good. I couldn't remember if it was the postmaster or child that validates that key. I now remember only the postmaster needs the secret because it sends the signal. Not sure what random seed Claudio was asking about. Probably GUC's "seed" parameter --- Claudio, that is already covered in that GUC binary file I create that I mentioned in an earlier email. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: