Re: fork/exec
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fork/exec |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311281948.hASJmpG11966@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fork/exec (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fork/exec
|
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote: > * With regards to BackendFork itself, was your plan to reduce this to simply > formatting the argument list, and calling fork/exec, with things like random > number seeding and the like moved into PostgresMain? (ie. the BackendFork > call would actually be performed by the Postmaster, with BackendFork > rewritten such that no "global" context is required between the fork and > exec calls; which'll be what we need to make Win32/CreateProcess changes > possible). If not, could you give me an idea of what you had intended? You will see code in postmaster.c that calls write_nondefault_variables(). That basically dumps out GUC variables into a binary file to be read in by fork/exec backends. My idea is that we will need another similar file for postmaster constants. The random seed value is unique per-backend, and we want to keep it secure so we can't pass it on the command line. I am not sure how to deal with that. I hesitate to add a per-backend file to pass such things. Does anyone have ideas on how to pass a data value to an exec()'ed child? Maybe we have to use a pipe between parent/child and pass the values that way. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: