Re: For full text indexing, which is better, tsearch2 or
От | Dror Matalon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For full text indexing, which is better, tsearch2 or |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031127010352.GT30893@rlx11.zapatec.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: For full text indexing, which is better, tsearch2 or (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 08:51:14AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >Which one is better (performance/easier to use), > >tsearch2 or fulltextindex? > >there is an example how to use fulltextindex in the > >techdocs, but I checked the contrib/fulltextindex > >package, there is a WARNING that fulltextindex is > >much slower than tsearch2. but tsearch2 seems > >complex to use, and I can not find a good example. > >Which one I should use? Any suggestions? > > I believe I wrote that warning :) > > Tsearch2 is what you should use. Yes, it's more complicated but it's > HEAPS faster and seriously powerful. > Can you provide some numbers please, both for creating full text indexes as well as for searching them? I tried to use tsearch and it seemed like just creating a full text index on million+ records took forever. > Just read the README file. > > You could also try out the original tsearch (V1), but that will probably > be superceded soon, now that tsearch2 is around. > > Chris > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Dror Matalon Zapatec Inc 1700 MLK Way Berkeley, CA 94709 http://www.fastbuzz.com http://www.zapatec.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: