Re: performance problem

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 01:52:10PM -0700, Rick Gigger wrote:

> I worked around this by starting the transaction and inserting the 45,000
> rows and then killing it.  The I removed the index and readded it which
> apparently gathered some stats and since there were all of the dead tuples
> in there from the failed transaction it now decided that it should use the
> index.  I reran the script and this time it took 5 minutes again instead of
> 1 1/2 hours.

Stats are not collected automatically.  You should run ANALYZE after
importing your data.  And it's probably faster to create the index after
the data is loaded, too.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Y una voz del caos me habl� y me dijo
"Sonr�e y s� feliz, podr�a ser peor".
Y sonre�. Y fui feliz.
Y fue peor.