Re: Commercial binary support?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Commercial binary support? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311191856.hAJIu8S09977@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Commercial binary support? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Commercial binary support?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is > > > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own > > > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here? > > > > Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several > > companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL > > and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not. > > We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ... And I know CommandPrompt doesn't care either. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: