Re: SuSE RPMs available for PostgreSQL 7.4
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SuSE RPMs available for PostgreSQL 7.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311191403.08081.lowen@pari.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SuSE RPMs available for PostgreSQL 7.4 ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: SuSE RPMs available for PostgreSQL 7.4
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 01:43 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > So why don't you do > > > > binary/redhat/ > > SRPMS > > fedora-this > > redhat-that > peter and I agree *sooooo* often, but I do agree with him on this one ... > I'd love to see someone submit binaries for, say, the various version of > solaris, and the current dir hierachy doesn't seem to 'flow' for doing > multiple OS distributions ... That would work, except for the fact the the RPM's are not just for Red Hat. But, if the consensus of the list is to do it this way, then I'll maintain a symlink structure (to keep from wasting space) that will implement this. Is this what the users want? > As lamar says, Solaris can do rpm's, but why, when it has pkg_add ... If a user has gone to the trouble to install RPM on Solaris, that that user is probably going to want to use an RPM. In the case of FreeBSD, isn't it the preference to use the ports system? In the case of Debian, Oliver maintains his package inside of the Debian system, and not on ftp.postgresql.org. I don't want to waste postgresql.org's disk space or bandwidth. Or, to recast the question, do people think it's a good idea for PGDG to have a 'canonical' general, master, source RPM to try to keep the various RPM-based distributions using a common base for more consistent installs (that become easier to support and troubleshoot)? If the consensus is that we should just let the distributions do all the work and maintain parallel variants (hosted by their own servers), well, that's OK with me. I can go off to the Fedora Core people and volunteer to just keep up the Fedora Core PostgreSQL RPM set, and forget about generic issues. Or even let someone else do it; Red Hat has their own internal maintainer that is quite capable of doing the job. Do I need to continue to do what I've been doing? I certainly want to continue, but if the effort isn't needed, well, I can put my energies elsewhere, both inside the PostgreSQL project as well as outside. I certainly have learned a great deal while doing this, and don't regret any of it. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: