Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031117234738.W731@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released (Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > Somebody please explain to me what the hell a difference it makes if > > > we have a v in front of the version number? > > > > It isn't standard practice. I agree with Peter on this. > > > > Also, as I have asked before, please make sure that future releases sort > > in the correct order. It makes life much easier for those of us who > > make packages and the many users who install packages. > > > > The cycle of releases we have had were: > > 7.4beta[1-5] > > 7.4RC[12] > > 7.4 > > > > These sort in reverse (ASCII) order to their real priority. > > > > So the series of Debian packages were numbered: > > 7.3.99.7.4beta[1-5] > > 7.3.99.7.4rc[12] > > 7.4 > > > > I hope users who were tracking these understood the relationship between > > Marc's numbers and mine. > > Agreed, I'd like to see the v dropped from everything as well. It's > not crucial, but I've stumbled over it numerous times. -sc But there is no v in any of the release files ... just checked to make sure, and even the 6.x branch didn't have any v in the file names ... the only place I've ever used the 'v' is in emails ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: