Re: pg_restore and FK constraints with large dbs
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_restore and FK constraints with large dbs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031116101702.Q64286@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_restore and FK constraints with large dbs (ow <oneway_111@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_restore and FK constraints with large dbs
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, ow wrote: > --- Peter EiEisentrautpeter_e@gmgmxet> wrote: > > > > Read again. No one was talking of pg_restore. > > Perhaps I should clarify. > > First, I ran pg_dump to extract schema and data *together*. Then I ran > pg_restore to restore the db. It took about 1 hour to create tables and copy > the data, then about 40 min to create indexes, then pg_restore spent 4.5 hours > checking one (1) FKFKonstraint (80M table with FKFKsgainst 20K table with PKPKs > > 4.5 hours to check one FKFKonstraint - this is want I meant by bad performance. > I'm looking for a way to suspend FKFKhecks since data is coming from pg_dump > and, hence, it's clean. Only assuming that no changes were made between dump and restore. This could be changes to schema or data done manually, but it could also be a locale or possibly encoding change if you have any textual foreign keys.
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: