Re: Programatically switching database
От | ow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Programatically switching database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031116051842.57962.qmail@web21404.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Programatically switching database (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Programatically switching database
Re: Programatically switching database COPY |
Список | pgsql-sql |
--- Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com> wrote: > #!/bin/sh > > ( > echo "start transaction;" > cat $2 > echo "commit transaction;" > ) psql $1 > > > > then call it as > > reload_in_transaction my_db my_namespace.dump > > Since the whole dump will be restored inside of one transaction, nobody > will see it while it's reloading. Interesting idea. I know some RDBMSs that are very picky about DDL in transactions but it appears pgSql handles it without any problems. My concern though ... wouldn't pgSql server collapse when faced with transaction spawning across 100M+ records? And how would that affect overall restore time? I've should've tried it myself but I can't, my "regular" pg_restore has been running for 4+ hours, can't kill now ... Thanks __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: