Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200311131742.hADHgIT16699@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CreateProcess vs Create Thread ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Hello, > > O.k. there has been a lot of discussion in regards to what the best > method to take with PostgreSQL Win32 is. > It seems that the community is set on using CreateProcess. If this is > the case I have a couple of further questions: > > 1. Are we just a bunch of Unix coders trying to develop a product for > Win32 or are there any people a part > of the Win32 port project that actually have REAL, hardcore experience > coding at the system level for Win32? > I am not trying to be an antagonist but I it is a legitimate question. Not sure. We have a working Win32 port from PeerDirect, and I have one from SRA, so we know it can be done whether we have hard-core guys or not. > 2. Have we built a test case? For example: > > We have a client that connects to a server. For every connection we > start a new process and write 1k to disk from the client. > > Connect in varying degrees from 5 connection to say 500 connections. > > Do it with CreateProcess and the with CreateThread... Time the > difference, and review the load on the server during the tests... > > What is the difference? Maybe it is nominal enough not to worry > about it... Maybe it's not. I certainly would like to see that test with a skelaton C program. You can use PeerDirect's beta version for the CreateProcess test. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: