Re: Perfomance difference between 7.2 and 7.3
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perfomance difference between 7.2 and 7.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031112153956.GA30935@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Perfomance difference between 7.2 and 7.3 (Paulo Jan <admin@digital.ddnet.es>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 16:30:41 +0100, Paulo Jan <admin@digital.ddnet.es> wrote: > This table has about 28000 rows, and is running with Postgres 7.2.3 > under Red Hat 8.0, in a 2.4 Ghz. Pentiun 4 with 512 Mb. of RAM. You probably want to use 7.4 for this since a new way to do aggragates using hashes has been added. 7.4 is currently in release candidate status and maybe be released as early as next Monday. > > This query takes up to 3 minutes to execute. I have tried to strip > it down and leaving it in its most vanilla form (without "count(id)" and > But here is the weird thing: I dump the table, export it into > another machine running Postgres 7.3.2 (Celeron 1.7 Ghz, 512 Mb. of > memory), and the query takes only 2 or 3 seconds to execute, even though > the query plan is almost the same: This makes it sound like you haven't been properly vacuuming and/or analyzing the database. You might want to run a vacuum full on the production db and see if that speeds things up. Once you have done a vacuum full then regular vacuums should keep the number of dead tuples down (as long as FSM is set high enough).
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: