Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code
От | Marcus Meissner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031106130334.GA1240@suse.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Erroneous PPC spinlock code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:08:56AM +0100, Reinhard Max wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 at 13:28, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > > > > The SuSE PPC guru said that the PPC spinlock code we currently use > > > may behave erroneously on multiprocessor systems. > > > > What's his evidence for that claim? > > Let's ask himself. > > > The code we have is based directly on the recommendations in the PPC > > manuals, and has been tested on multi-CPU systems. > > Marcus, can you explain the details, please? I reviewed the documentation again (at:http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/esdd/articles/powerpc.html ) and it seems to agree with your opinion. I retract my comment, leave your code as-is. Ciao, Marcus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: