Re: slow down on UPDATE using IN statements
От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
---|---|
Тема | Re: slow down on UPDATE using IN statements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031103140954.GB1263@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | slow down on UPDATE using IN statements (MaRcElO PeReIrA <gandalf_mp@yahoo.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
In versions 7.3 and before, IN was a dog compared to the equivalent EXISTS statement. But given your timings, how long has it been since you did a VACUUM ANALYZE FULL on your database? Or REINDEX on any of the indexes? Hope this helps, On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:52:44AM -0300, MaRcElO PeReIrA wrote: > Hi there, > > I was in troubles with a UPDATE+IN statement: > > The following command use to take about 5 minutes to > be done: > > UPDATE requisicao SET conclusao='3' WHERE reg IN > (SELECT reg FROM requisicao WHERE now()-data>'15 > days'); > > The table 'requisicao' has only about 400 lines (!!). > > If I change it to: > > UPDATE requisicao SET conclusao='3' WHERE reg IN (12, > 45, 87, 98, 129, 350, 389); > > I have detected that the major problem isn't in the > amount of lines changed, but in the subselect. > > How can I solve/optimize it? I would like to use the > IN, but in the last case I would make a software > change. > > Thanks in advance and > Best regards, > > Marcelo Pereira > Brazil > > Yahoo! Mail - o melhor webmail do Brasil > http://mail.yahoo.com.br > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > "All that is needed for the forces of evil to triumph is for enough good > men to do nothing." - Edmond Burke > "The penalty good people pay for not being interested in politics is to be > governed by people worse than themselves." - Plato
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: