Re: PostgreSQL 7.4beta5 vs MySQL 4.0.16 with RT(DBIx::SearchBuilder)

On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 01:15:44AM +0530, mallah@trade-india.com wrote:
> Actually PostgreSQL is at par with  MySQL when the query is being Properly Written(simplified)
>
> In mysql:
> mysql> SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM Groups main join  Principals  Principals_1 using(id) join  ACL
> ACL_2 on (ACL_2.PrincipalId = Principals_1.id)

Interesting, last time I looked, this syntax wasn't valid on mysql.
And I'm not familiar with the "using(id)" notation. Can you point me at
proper docs on it?


>
> So its not just PostgreSQL that is suffering from the bad SQL but MySQL also.
> But the question is my does PostgreSQL suffer so badly ??
> I think not all developers write very nice SQLs.
>
> Its really sad to see that a fine peice of work (RT) is performing sub-optimal
> becoz of malformed SQLs.  [ specially on database of my choice ;-) ]

Can you try using SearchBuilder 0.90? That made certain optimizations to
the postgres query builder that got backed out in 0.92, due to a
possible really bad failure mode. Thankfully, because all of this is
machine generated SQL we can just improve the generator, rather than
having to retool the entire application.


--
jesse reed vincent -- root@eruditorum.org -- jesse@fsck.com
70EBAC90: 2A07 FC22 7DB4 42C1 9D71 0108 41A3 3FB3 70EB AC90

"If IBM _wanted_ to make clones, we could make them cheaper and faster than
anyone else!"  - An IBM Rep. visiting Vassar College's Comp Sci Department.