Re: Isolation levels READ UNCOMMITTED and REPEATABLE READ
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Isolation levels READ UNCOMMITTED and REPEATABLE READ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200310260257.h9Q2vt425828@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Isolation levels READ UNCOMMITTED and REPEATABLE READ (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO: * Allow more ISOLATION LEVELS to be accepted, but issue a warning for them --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > I think we could allow users to set the transaction isolation level to > > READ UNCOMMITTED or REPEATABLE READ and internally behave like READ > > COMMITTED or SERIALIZABLE, respectively. The SQL standard seems to allow > > this: > > My reading is that the spec *requires* this. We have not done it > because there was some feeling that people would be confused if the > isolation levels appeared to exist but didn't really work as they > expected. But a notice or something could help address that concern. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: