Re: My own performance/tuning q&a
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: My own performance/tuning q&a |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200310242050.h9OKoYX22829@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: My own performance/tuning q&a (Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: My own performance/tuning q&a
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Vivek Khera wrote: > >>>>> "sm" == scott marlowe <scott.marlowe> writes: > > > sm> Note that Tom has mentioned problems with possible deadlocks when nicing > sm> individual backends before, so proceed with caution here. > > I can see possible starvation, but if scheduling changes cause > deadlocks, then there's something wrong with the design. Yes, I think Tom's concern was priority inversion, where a low priority process holds a lock while a higher one waits for it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: