Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200310211555.h9LFtLK22606@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I guess my question would be how many people are using information > >> schemas vs. have loaded databases they don't want to reload. > > > We are still in beta, not RC ... why is this even an issue? > > Given that no one's squawked, I think it isn't... We try to limit initdb in late betas --- that has always been our process. I don't have any problem with the initdb, though. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: