Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200310161852.h9GIqtA02521@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > Also, I thought Peter advocated adding -g a few releases back. I didn't > > > agree, but I lost the vote, so I thought it was done. Were we > > > supresssing -g in older releases? Peter? > > > > I don't recall any such vote. Had we done that, we'd have removed > > --enable-debug, I'd think. > > The vote was whether -g should be used for a default compile. Of course > --enable-debug would continue using -g. Maybe we kept --enable-debug > for backward compatibility or to force -g if you modified CFLAGS? Here is the thread discussing the -g flag: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00281.php -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: