Re: 2-phase commit
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2-phase commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031009160718.GC14394@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2-phase commit (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2-phase commit
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:22:05AM -0400, Mike Mascari wrote: > The implementation choosen depends upon the answer, does it not? Is > there an implementation (e.g. 3PC) that can simulate 2PC behavior for > interoperability purposes and satisfy both requirements? I don't know. What I know is that someone showed up working on 2PC, and got a frosty reception. I'm trying to learn what criteria would make the work acceptable. For my purposes, the feature would be really nice, so I'd hate to see the opportunity lost. If someone has an idea even how 3PC might be implemented, I'd be happy to hear it. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: