Re: Replication Bundled with Main Source.
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication Bundled with Main Source. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031009141508.GC14048@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication Bundled with Main Source. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 08:28:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > open source, we could think about it. Having looked at the code, I > think it's definitely not ready for prime time, but it could get there > with some work. When it's of comparable solidity to the base project I agree completely. You can get a long way with this code -- we've used a version of it in production for 2 years now -- but it's a long way from "turn it on and forget it" right now. I also wonder why there's a push to put "replication" in the main distribution, though. I know, I know, the argument is that if you have to get it separately, it's not the same as the "main" code. But it's just not true that Oracle (or whoever you like) "includes" replication. You have to buy the right licenses to get the functions you want, and there are different kinds of subsystems depending on what needs you have. (e.g. RAC is gonna be a lousy choice across a frame-relay VPN. I shudder to think.) I suppose someone could package a "kitchen sink" Postgres which included all kinds of stuff from gborg. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: