Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031002171430.GJ31782@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL (Matt Christian <matt@summersault.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:59:03AM -0500, Matt Christian wrote: > The project will be ported form an existing codebase which uses Oracle > as the backend. If that's the case, then your developers will want Postgres anyway. MySQL is just not feature-comparable. Postgres is. > I understand that Postgres has been closing the speed gap with MySQL, > but I'm having trouble finding hard data on this. What specific > information is available in this area? What specific information is there that MySQL was ever faster ;-) The benchmarks are all lousy, as near as anyone's been able to tell, but Great Bridge did a benchmark some time ago which purported to prove that PostgreSQL was almost as fast as an industry-leading database with "7i" in its name. If that's useful to you, google for "breat bridge benchmark". A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: