Re: is this my date problem
От | Theodore Petrosky |
---|---|
Тема | Re: is this my date problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031002121539.78564.qmail@web41006.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: is this my date problem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
So really if I had started coding this in a month other than September I would have seen the problem sooner... Thanks for the help.... Ted --- Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Theodore Petrosky <tedpet5@yahoo.com> writes: > > I should have sent this... it is very > interesting.. > > agencysacks=# select to_timestamp('01 October 2003 > > 00:01', 'DD Month YYYY HH24:MI'); > > to_timestamp > > --------------------- > > 0003-10-01 00:01:00 > > (1 row) > > Oh ... duh ... you should have said > > regression=# select to_timestamp('01 October 2003 > 00:01', 'DD FMMonth YYYY HH24:MI'); > to_timestamp > ------------------------ > 2003-10-01 00:01:00-04 > (1 row) > > There's been repeated discussion about whether our > to_timestamp code > should be more forgiving of input that does not > match the given format, > but right at the moment it's pretty unforgiving. > > BTW, have you considered the likelihood that you > shouldn't be using > to_timestamp at all? The timestamp datatype input > converter gets this > right: > > regression=# select '01 October 2003 > 00:01'::timestamp; > timestamp > --------------------- > 2003-10-01 00:01:00 > (1 row) > > ISTM that to_timestamp is intended for cases where > you want to be rigid > about the data format. If you think that the input > data is > self-explanatory then try just casting it to > timestamp. > > regards, tom lane __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: