Re: advice on raid controller
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: advice on raid controller |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200309271253.04940.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | advice on raid controller (Richard Jones <rj@last.fm>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
RIchard, > Hi, i'm on the verge of buying a "MegaRAID SCSI 320-2" raid controller. > I need it to build a db server using 4x ultra320 scsi disks > i'm thinking raid 1+0 but will try with raid5 too and compare Depends on your type of database. If you're doing web or OLAP (lots of read-only queries) RAID 5 will probably be better. If you're doing OLTP (lots of read-write) RAID 10 will almost certainly be better. But if you have time, testing is always best. > as seen: > http://uk.azzurri.com/product/product.cgi?productId=188 I haven'te used it personally, but what I don't see in the docs is a battery-backed cache. Without battery backup on the write cache, IMHO you are better off with Linux of BSD software RAID, since you'll have to turn off the card's write cache, lest your database get corrupted on power-out. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: