Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200309251657.h8PGv9317566@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows) ("Keith Bottner" <kbottner@comcast.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Keith Bottner wrote: > Typically variables that you want to be per-thread are stored in what > Microsoft calls Thread Local Storage (TLS). Variables that you want shared > you can just treat as globals and statics with the appropriate threading > synchronization primitives. With Windows 2000 and later you have up to 1088 > TLS locations that you can use, of course these can be pointers to memory > which can store whatever you want. Goes GCC on Windows support TLS, or only Microsoft compilers? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: