Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200309150939.19008.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point? (Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL <> MySQL: missing the point?
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Alexey, Ian, > There are 2 sorts of people using MySQL: > 1) Those who know several RDBMSs and use it only when it is the best > tool for the job (read-only web DB, storing logs, etc) > 2) Those who know only MySQL and think that it is the Ultimate Solution > for Everything. Actually, for Comdex, I'm concerned about: 3) Management who know nothing about technology and are considering MySQL because MySQL AB has very nice brochures. This is *very* important becuase no-nothing management types are frequently in a position to mandate technology choice. MySQL, like Microsoft before them, have realized that being *perceived* as an enterprise database is, from a sales perspective, almost as good as being one. We will be at the convention with some card tables, some CDs and a handful of xeroxed brochures. MySQL will have a multi-media booth with big banners and uniforms. We need some substance to counter the glitz, and this is a very good start. That being said, I would like to see Alexey's other points included in the paper. *particularly* the part about license changes and MySQL's closed development process. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: