Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines

OK.  You'da boss.  :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I can make the change, but --without seemed to more closely match
> > because it was like readline where you didn't have it, and had to say so
> > specifically.  I don't see how we can say --disable because this is case
> > were we clearly don't have spinlocks to enable, no?
>
> ./configure --help | grep --relevant-stuff
>
> Optional Features:
>   --disable-FEATURE       do not include FEATURE (same as --enable-FEATURE=no)
>   --enable-FEATURE[=ARG]  include FEATURE [ARG=yes]
>
> Optional Packages:
>   --with-PACKAGE[=ARG]    use PACKAGE [ARG=yes]
>   --without-PACKAGE       do not use PACKAGE (same as --with-PACKAGE=no)
>
> Readline is a package, spinlocks are a feature.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073