Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200309120409.h8C49oV06119@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Well, the problem was that we defined HAS_TEST_AND_SET inside the ports. > > I guess we could splatter a test for Itanium and Opterion in every port > > that could possibly use it, but then again, if we fall back to not > > finding it for some reason, we don't get a report because we silently > > fall back to semaphores. That's what has me worried, that if we don't > > do it, we will not know what platforms really aren't working properly. > > >From what I understand, "not working properly" means slow, not broken, no? > Which means ppl could submit a problem report and it could be fixed for > v7.4.1 ... its not so much 'not working properly' as it is 'not optimal > performance' ... Right, though I am not sure people will know _slow_ configuration vs. PostgreSQL is slow. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: