Re: Upgrade Woes
От | aturner@neteconomist.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrade Woes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030911191018.GA11764@neteconomist.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrade Woes (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
In the performance case the machine was running RedHat AS 2.1. I have posted the database schema at (obtained from pg_dump-s): http://serverbeach.plexq.com/~aturner/schema.sql The time to run all the stats procedures dropped through the floor. refresh_hourly_iud, adl_hourly_iud, rebuild_daily_totaletc. There is a python script that calls the proc once for each hour or day. When running the historicalcalc job for a 7 day period back, it would crawl on 7.3.3. We started benching the drive array and found otherissues with the system in the mean time (like the drive array was giving us 10MB/sec write speed - the guy who set itup did not enable write to cache). Once it was reconfigured the DB performance did not improve much (bonnie++ was usedto verify the RAID array speed). Alex Turner On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:47:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > aturner@neteconomist.com writes: > > As for 7.3.3, the project in question suffered a 10x performance > > degredation on 7.3.3 which went away when we rolled back to 7.3.2. > > I would like to pursue that report and find out why. I've just gone > through the CVS logs between 7.3.2 and 7.3.3, and I don't see any change > that would explain a 10x slowdown. Can you provide more details about > exactly what slowed down? > > Also, what PG version were you using on the old RedHat 7.2 installation? > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: