Re: PostgreSQL Reliability when fsync = false on Linux-XFS
| От | Sean Chittenden |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Reliability when fsync = false on Linux-XFS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20030904072735.GB75041@perrin.nxad.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Reliability when fsync = false on Linux-XFS ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Reliability when fsync = false on Linux-XFS
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> Just wonderin. What if you symlink WAL to a directory which is on > mounted USB RAM drive? USB 2.0 you mean? It supposedly runs at 1394 speeds, but USB 1.0/1.1 runs at 1MB/s under ideal circumstances... that's slower than even old IDE drives. > Will that increase any throughput? Probably not... > I am sure a 256/512MB flash drive will cost lot less than a SCSI > disk. May be even a GB on flash drive would do.. That's true... but on a per $$/MB, you're better off investing in RAM and increasing your effective_cache_size. If dd to a flash card is faster than to an IDE drive, please let me know. :) -sc -- Sean Chittenden UNIX(TM), a BSD like Operating System
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: