Re: Unixware Patch (Was: Re: Beta2 Tag'd and Bundled ...)

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Yes, and that is the complex part because _some_ non-*_r functions are
> > thread-safe, and some are not.  I have to determine if we have other
> > such platforms before I figure out how to fix it in the cleanest way.
> 
> Long shot ... is there some way of writing a configure test for this?
> Right now, it sounds like we're going to be hitting alot of trial-n-error
> if there isn't ...

How would we test if a function is thread-safe?  I can't think of a
reliable way, and hence my warning that this adjusting could take a
while.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073