Re: 2-phase commit
От | Jeroen T. Vermeulen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2-phase commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030828081957.GA90132@xs4all.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2-phase commit (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 08:04:13PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > > Interesting/positive news on this front; the XA specification > documents are now all available in PDF form "freely", from the Open > Group, where they used to be fairly pricey. A step in the right direction, but AFAIC it's too little, too late. The impression I get, at least, is that it's as good as dead now: Java may use it, but it hides the details anyway so it might as well not be there--the Java way is to standardize the API but nothing that goes "on the wire". Lots of proprietary middleware uses XA, but from what I hear there are enough subtle differences to make mixing-and-matching of products risky at best--the proprietary way is to bundle products that will work at least marginally together, and relegate standards to a bullshit point in the PowerPoint presentations. "Based on industry standard" means about the same as "based on a true story." Then there's the fact that the necessary followup standards never got anywhere, and the fact that XA doesn't cope with threading really well. Don't get me wrong, XA support may well be a good thing. But at this stage, personally I'd go for a good 2PC implementation first and worry about supporting XA later. Jeroen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: