Re: Replication Ideas

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marc G. Fournier
Тема Re: Replication Ideas
Дата
Msg-id 20030826025754.V691@ganymede.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Replication Ideas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Replication Ideas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Replication Ideas  ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
Список pgsql-general

On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com> writes:
> > Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is
> > capable of transparent failover,
>
> What makes you say that?  My understanding is it's supposed to survive
> loss of individual servers.

How does it play 'catch up' went a server comes back online?

note that I did go through the 'docs' on how it works, and am/was quite
impressed at what they were doing ... but, if I have a large network, say,
and one group is connecting to ServerA, and another group with ServerB,
what happens when ServerA and ServerB loose network connectivity for any
period of time?  How do they re-sync when the network comes back up again?

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rudy Koento
Дата:
Сообщение: postgresql not using index even though it's faster
Следующее
От: "Bupp Phillips"
Дата:
Сообщение: What is the fastest way to get a resultset