Re: Mail server load
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mail server load |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030820161015.A89848@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mail server load (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mail server load
|
Список | pgsql-general |
16:00 ... neptune# awk '{print $7}' /var/log/amavisd | sort | uniq -c 285 BAD 1807 BANNED 12289 INFECTED 11731 Passed, 5 SA 1 turned Here's a normal day: neptune# cat /var/log/amavisd.o | grep "Aug 17" | awk '{print $7}' | sort | uniq -c 332 BAD 13 BANNED 938 INFECTED 3792 Passed, On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk> writes: > > Yesterday you had almost 1 for 1 valid email. By then I think I was getting > > about 3-4 per valid email but since then it's sky rocketed and it looks more > > like 30+ per 1 valid message. > > FWIW, this is what I see in traffic to an address I've had to abandon > because of spam: > > 488 Aug 8 > 433 Aug 9 > 435 Aug 10 > 426 Aug 11 > 504 Aug 12 > 458 Aug 13 > 469 Aug 14 > 390 Aug 15 > 433 Aug 16 > 371 Aug 17 > 520 Aug 18 > 36473 Aug 19 > 35808 Aug 20 > > It's about 3pm local time here, so by midnight the stat for today will > probably be nearly double yesterday's total. > > The spam traffic had been around 2K/day at the beginning of the year, > but tapered off to around 500 as you see above. This spike is ten times > the highest I've seen before. If I were actually downloading this crap, > and not rejecting it at the SMTP handshake, my DSL line would be > saturated :-( > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: