Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200308130910.38343.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Draft #6: Semi-Final
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Neil, > [If my comments below have already been raised, sorry -- I've been away, > and missed the earlier drafts of the release.] Howdy! How was the internship? > I don't think the main intent of the new wire protocol is to "increase the > speed of data transfers" -- does it actually make a significant > improvement? (I'm not sure, having been away for the summer). Somebody else inserted this; I'll let them defend it. > > HIGH AVAILABILITY: Expansion of PostgreSQL's Free Space Map disk > > management feature to support continuous index maintenence and the Auto > > Vacuum Daemon are the last "puzzle pieces" in providing 99.999% uptime > > for PostgreSQL databases. > > I certainly wouldn't call the autovacuum stuff the "last piece" in HA for > PostgreSQL, and ISTM you just picked 5 nines right out of thin air. Hmmm .... I see what you mean. I was trying to cut length by not having pgavd as a seperate sentence. And yes, the 99.999 stuff is made up, although completely possible now ... If you have a suggestion for re-wording that paragraph around more solid information, I'd like to see it. We want to get the point across that vacuuming indexes + pgavd = no shutting the database down or lokcing tables except for version upgrades, ever. And it has to be translated into marketing-hypespeak. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: