Re: Update of foreign key values

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephan Szabo
Тема Re: Update of foreign key values
Дата
Msg-id 20030812080954.A11777-100000@megazone.bigpanda.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Update of foreign key values  ("Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders@acm.org>)
Список pgsql-general
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Roderick A. Anderson wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> > Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
> > set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
> > consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
> > docs)
>
> Phew.  I thought I was going bonkers.  Then add that I never named the
> constraints so I was still out'a luck.

Well, the constraint still got an autogenerated name, so you probably
could have used that, although you might end up affecting more constraints
than you had meant.



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dennis Gearon
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: types of constraint deferment
Следующее
От: Dennis Gearon
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/C functions