Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200307221850.h6MIocK10571@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question (Jord Tanner <jord@indygecko.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jord Tanner wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:39, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > But CPU affinity isn't realated to hyperthreading, as far as I know. > > CPU affinity tries to keep processes on the same cpu in case there is > > still valuable info in the cpu cache. > > > > It is true that CPU affinity is designed to prevent the dump of valuable > CPU cache. My thought is that if you are trying to prevent CPU > contention, you could use CPU affinity to prevent 2 postmaster processes > from running simultaneously on the same die. Am I out to lunch here? > I've not worked with CPU affinity before, so I'm not familiar with the > intimate details. I guess you could but it is the backends that use the cpu. I don't think manually specifying affinity will work for most applications. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: