Why does it not use the index?
От | Philip Greer |
---|---|
Тема | Why does it not use the index? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030721170607.GA18568@tildesoftware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Why does it not use the index?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
This one is irritating. Here's some psql output: ================================================================================ dumps=# \d fal_profdel Table "fal_profdel" Attribute | Type | Modifier -----------+--------------------------+---------- sid | character(4) | not null card_num | character(19) | not null date_del | timestamp with time zone | filename | character varying(30) | Indices: fal_prfdel_cn, fal_prfdel_date, fal_prfdel_pk dumps=# \d fal_prfdel_cn Index "fal_prfdel_cn" Attribute | Type -----------+--------------- card_num | character(19) unique btree dumps=# explain select card_num from fal_profdel where card_num = 'removed_for_privacy'; NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: Seq Scan on fal_profdel (cost=0.00..120546.39 rows=46649 width=12) EXPLAIN ================================================================================ Now, why the heck is the select query not using the index? I've tried it by having an exact 19 character card_num as well- still explains as a 'Seq Scan' (tablespace scan) - and each query takes up to 37 seconds (thus confirming that it isindeed doing scans and not using the index). I've tried dropping and re-creating the indexes, still it explains as tablespace scans. I am running postgresql 7.1.3 - a bit old, I know, but I have had no reason to upgrade just yet. By the way, the fal_profdel table has 4,664,867 rows in it currently - thus I really don't want full table scans! -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PG.. philip@tildesoftware.com Law of probable dispersal: Whatever it is that hits the fan will not be evenly distributed.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: