On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:27:30AM -0400, Dmitry Tkach wrote:
> Why not just allow setObject() to take Collection as an argument?
You need information on the SQL type of the contents to be able to turn them
into a DB representation correctly. We can't use the type parameter to
setObject() for this as that should reflect the whole paramater, i.e.
probably Types.OTHER in this case.
java.sql.Array has a getBaseType() that does the job.
> You would not need any special implementations then... and the
> application would not need to waste cycles on wrapping/unwrapping those
> Arrays every time...
Hah, and it's faster to wrap your array of ints in a bunch of
java.lang.Integer objects so you can put in in a Collection? :)
-O