Re: Datatypes and performance
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Datatypes and performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200307210210.h6L2AKQ12895@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Datatypes and performance (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Richard Huxton wrote: > > If the answer is "yes", then I understand the use of FSYNC. > > > > If the answer is "no", then i don't see the point in using FSYNC at all. > > The answer is "yes" providing: > 1. Your hardware didn't suffer a failure during the outage. > 2. Your disks don't like to the operating-system. > > The second point is important - some disks have write-cache enabled and report > "done" when data is written to the cache not the platter. Google for > discussion. The problem here is whether write-cache is enabled _and_ the disk drive doesn't use some trick of using the disk drive rotational energy to ensure that the write cache gets flushed to disk on a power failure, or perhaps uses some short-term battery to make sure the data gets flushed. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: